<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DalSoft &#187; yam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/tag/yam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Dalsoft&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Visual Studio 2010 &#8211; K&amp;R Coding Style Variant</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/06/04/visual-studio-2010-kr-coding-style-variant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/06/04/visual-studio-2010-kr-coding-style-variant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allman style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K&R Coding Style Variant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVC 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I program with different languages and for a while now I have wanted to make the K&#38;R variant coding style my default in Visual Studio. So what do I mean by the K&#38;R variant coding style, this coding style was named after co authors of the book The C Programming Language (thank you Wikipedia!) Kernighan [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/06/04/visual-studio-2010-kr-coding-style-variant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSDN Downloads Java Applet?</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/18/msdn-downloads-java-applet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/18/msdn-downloads-java-applet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/18/msdn-downloads-java-applet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just downloaded the official release of Visual Studio 2010 and nearly fell of my chair, when I saw that the new download manager is a Java Applet. Is Microsoft going soft? Or are we starting to see vendors use the best technology for the job, rather than what company developed the technology. I would of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/18/msdn-downloads-java-applet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing the iGoogle 404</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/13/introducing-the-igoogle-404/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/13/introducing-the-igoogle-404/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iGoogle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stumbled across a very strange &#8220;issue&#8221; with iGoogle. Very easy to reproduce: Type into your browser www.google.com/ig and you get iGoogle nothing strange there. Type in www.google.com/IG and you get a 404 error?? Really what happened to my iGoogle homepage? Surely the good people at Google follow HTTP Protocol standards http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html namely: 3.2.3 URI Comparison [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/13/introducing-the-igoogle-404/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C# 4.0 supports optional parameters</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/11/c-4-0-supports-default-values-for-optional-method-parameters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/11/c-4-0-supports-default-values-for-optional-method-parameters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET 4.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/11/c-4-0-supports-default-values-for-optional-method-parameters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In VB.NET you have always been able to use optional parameters: Sub Foo(ByVal p1 As String, Optional ByVal p2 As String = "default value") End Sub 'Call to Foo with 1 of the 2 parameters is allowed Foo("p1 value") Now in C# 4.0 we get the same support: void Foo(string p1, string p2 = "default [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/11/c-4-0-supports-default-values-for-optional-method-parameters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team Foundation Server 2010 now comes free with your MSDN subscription</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/team-foundation-server-2010-now-comes-free-with-your-msdn-subscription/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/team-foundation-server-2010-now-comes-free-with-your-msdn-subscription/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Foundation Server 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But I for one, think this is too little too late. Is this enough to make us migrate of off Subversion, NUnit or CruiseControl.NET?  No but it might be able to fill a very small gap left by open source tools.  But I will not be switching from any open source frameworks for Team Foundation Server [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/team-foundation-server-2010-now-comes-free-with-your-msdn-subscription/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A better way to call a JavaScript function using a string</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/22/a-better-way-to-call-a-javascript-function-using-a-string/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/22/a-better-way-to-call-a-javascript-function-using-a-string/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually when I need to call a JavaScript function using a string I use: function myUsefulFunction() { //useful code } var foo = 'myUsefulFunction();'; eval(foo); However a more elegant approach would be to use: function myUsefulFunction() { //useful code } this['myUsefulFunction'](); Why does this work? It works because nearly everything in JavaScript is an object, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/22/a-better-way-to-call-a-javascript-function-using-a-string/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ to SQL fully supported in .NET 4.0</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/11/linq-to-sql-fully-supported-in-net-4-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/11/linq-to-sql-fully-supported-in-net-4-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the rumours LINQ to SQL is fully supported in .NET 4.0, it has even been improved including better mockability, link below has more details .  Good news for all the early adopters you don&#8217;t have to redevelop all your LINQ to SQL apps to entities, just to be supported by Micro$oft. http://damieng.com/blog/2009/06/01/linq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/11/linq-to-sql-fully-supported-in-net-4-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Converting a ASP.NET Web Site to a Web Application Project</title>
		<link>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/09/12/converting-a-asp-net-web-site-to-a-web-application-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/09/12/converting-a-asp-net-web-site-to-a-web-application-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DalSoft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App_Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUnit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Application Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am currently converting a lot of  legacy ASP.NET Web Sites over to ASP.NET Web Application Projects.  The reason for doing this is so I can make my NUnit Test project reference my Web Application Project.  There are various discussions about ASP.NET: Web Site vs. Web Application, but for me it was solely for testability [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dalsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/09/12/converting-a-asp-net-web-site-to-a-web-application-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
